Dear All,
Who can help me about a case regarding a pressure vessel stamped as "U2" which was manufactured, approved and shipped to the company i work for. But during the receiving inspection, in order to fit it to its final position, and according to internal inspection, some defects have been revealed on the visual weld inspection on the root of one of its nozzle like undercuttings, lack of fusion and concavity. We asked for the x-ray film to the manufacturer and they have sent to us but the result was approved. Then we have decided to perform another x-ray on that joint to confirm the manufacturer x-ray, using the same x-ray techinique and the result revealed porosities out of ASME VIII div 2 requirements. So, in this case, if we decide to repair this joint, would we need to classify the vessel again ?
Best regards,
Guttemberg Souza
--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
[MW:34916] Applicability of Impact requirement as per ASME B31.3
Dear All, Design code – ASME B31.3, Welding Code- ASME BPVC SEC IX Material to be used used during Fabrication - SA 333Gr6 (P No.1 G...
-
Q: What are equivalents for standard Q 235 B (and Q 235 A) for U-channels? ...
-
Definition of buttering from ASME Section IX, QW/QB-492 Definitions: Buttering: the addition of material, by welding, on one or bot...
-
Section I. PRINT READING 3-1. GENERAL a. Drawings . Drawing or sketching is a universal language used to convey all necessary information to...
No comments:
Post a Comment