Did you get Cb too in PMI?
In that case i suggest to go for a sample wet analysis
In that case i suggest to go for a sample wet analysis
From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of jignesh.rana@Linde-LE.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 4:37 PM
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [MW:6438] F91 vs F9 grade flanges
Dear Hrishi,
Can you share PMI results ?
What was the referent standard used ?
Please inform end application of the product also.
With Best Regards,
Jignesh R Rana
Manager - QA & QC
Linde Engineering India Pvt. Ltd.
38, Nutan Bharat Society, Alkapuri, Vadodara 390007, India
Tel.: +91 265 3056789, Fax: +91 265 2335213 , Mobil: +91 90999 86019
jignesh.rana@linde-le.com, www.linde-india.com
This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. You should not disclose its contents to any other person nor use it for any purposes.
| hrishikm07@gmail.com Sent by: materials-welding@googlegroups.com 11-08-10 05:18
|
|
Hi
I have some LA flanges certified as F9 grade as per MTC and TPI certificate. But when I conducted PMI using NITON-XRF machine I have observed presence of Vanadium slightly lower than F91 requirements in some of them.
My query is
If it is of F9 why there is Vanadium presence?
Can I accept it as F9 grade?
Thanks
Hrishi
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone Essar
No comments:
Post a Comment