Monday, July 31, 2017

[MW:26692] Slope tolerance on piping

Dears,

  Could you advise with code ref or guidlines.

Construction codes: ASME B31.1 & I sections.

What's the tolerance for piping slope ?

Regards.

--

Thanks and Regards, 
-----
زكرياء غراب
GHRAB Zakaria 

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Thursday, July 27, 2017

Re: [MW:26691] Hydrotest Pressure difference in Higher points caluclation

Can you give code reference for the formula ?
Never seen it in ASME Sec VIII Div.1 or 2.

PREM S NAUTIYAL
CELL : 9769316004


From: "\'raouf salhi\' via Materials & Welding" <materials-welding@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 20:32:36
To: "materials-welding@googlegroups.com" <materials-welding@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [MW:26690] Hydrotest Pressure difference in Higher points caluclation
 
DearsP= ρ.g.H
 

 ρ = test fluid density ( 1000 kg / m3 for water )
g = gravity ( 9.8 )
 
regards
 
SALHI Raouf
QA/QC Engineer
 
Tel: Morocco +212628979891
      Tunisia +21621458258

 
Le Jeudi 27 juillet 2017 4h39, ks sakhileshmon <kssakhilesh@gmail.com> a écrit :
 
Dear sir,
 
Can I know the details of "ρ" in this equation  P= ρ.g.H
 
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:12 PM, 'raouf salhi' via Materials & Welding <materials-welding@googlegroups.com" target='_blank' rel=external>materials-welding@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Dear chandra ,
 
To calculate pressure difference between two points with difefrent level we have this formula :
 
P= ρ.g.H

 
Le Mercredi 26 juillet 2017 14h15, Chandra Bhanu Mohapatra <bapunchandra@gmail.com');" >bapunchandra@gmail.com> a écrit :
 
 
Dear Experts
                      Anybody kindly provide any guidelines or formulas for pressure loss calculation during hydrotest against the elevation (from 0 elevation to any height )
--
tHanks & rEgards
Chandra Bhanu Mohapatra
 
 
--
https://materials-welding. blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/ groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com');" >materials-welding+unsubscribe@ googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/ group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ optout.

 
 
--
https://materials-welding. blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/ groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com');" >materials-welding+unsubscribe@ googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/ group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ optout.
 
 
--
Thanks & Regards.
SAKHILESHMON K S
 
--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com');" >materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 

 

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [MW:26690] Hydrotest Pressure difference in Higher points caluclation

DearsP= ρ.g.H


 ρ = test fluid density ( 1000 kg / m3 for water )
g = gravity ( 9.8 )

regards
 
SALHI Raouf
QA/QC Engineer

Tel: Morocco +212628979891
      Tunisia +21621458258


Le Jeudi 27 juillet 2017 4h39, ks sakhileshmon <kssakhilesh@gmail.com> a écrit :


Dear sir,

Can I know the details of "ρ" in this equation  P= ρ.g.H

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:12 PM, 'raouf salhi' via Materials & Welding <materials-welding@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Dear chandra ,

To calculate pressure difference between two points with difefrent level we have this formula :

P= ρ.g.H


Le Mercredi 26 juillet 2017 14h15, Chandra Bhanu Mohapatra <bapunchandra@gmail.com> a écrit :



Dear Experts
                      Anybody kindly provide any guidelines or formulas for pressure loss calculation during hydrotest against the elevation (from 0 elevation to any height )
--
tHanks & rEgards
Chandra Bhanu Mohapatra

--
https://materials-welding. blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/ groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@ googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/ group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ optout.


--
https://materials-welding. blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/ groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@ googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/ group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ optout.



--
Thanks & Regards.
SAKHILESHMON K S
--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [MW:26689] Hydrotest Pressure difference in Higher points caluclation

Dear sir,

Can I know the details of "ρ" in this equation  P= ρ.g.H

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:12 PM, 'raouf salhi' via Materials & Welding <materials-welding@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Dear chandra ,

To calculate pressure difference between two points with difefrent level we have this formula :

P= ρ.g.H


Le Mercredi 26 juillet 2017 14h15, Chandra Bhanu Mohapatra <bapunchandra@gmail.com> a écrit :



Dear Experts
                      Anybody kindly provide any guidelines or formulas for pressure loss calculation during hydrotest against the elevation (from 0 elevation to any height )
--
tHanks & rEgards
Chandra Bhanu Mohapatra

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Thanks & Regards.
SAKHILESHMON K S

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Wednesday, July 26, 2017

Re: [MW:26688] Hydrotest Pressure difference in Higher points caluclation

Dear chandra ,

To calculate pressure difference between two points with difefrent level we have this formula :

P= ρ.g.H


Le Mercredi 26 juillet 2017 14h15, Chandra Bhanu Mohapatra <bapunchandra@gmail.com> a écrit :



Dear Experts
                      Anybody kindly provide any guidelines or formulas for pressure loss calculation during hydrotest against the elevation (from 0 elevation to any height )
--
tHanks & rEgards
Chandra Bhanu Mohapatra

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[MW:26687] Hydrotest Pressure difference in Higher points caluclation


Dear Experts
                      Anybody kindly provide any guidelines or formulas for pressure loss calculation during hydrotest against the elevation (from 0 elevation to any height )
--
tHanks & rEgards
Chandra Bhanu Mohapatra

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Monday, July 24, 2017

RE: [MW:26686] 7018

The M designator is a "Mandatory Classification Designator" that indicates that the electrode meets the US military requirements (MIL Spec.)– see ASME Section II Part C, SFA-5.1 figure 10.  These are more stringent than typical commercial requirements.  The Level 1 indicates the testing level within the applicable MIL Spec. See the following.

 

Hope this helps/answers your question.

 

From SFA 5.1 Annex A:

 

A7.6.8 E7018M [E4918M] Classification

 

A7.6.8.1 E7018M [E4918M] electrodes are similar to E7018-1H4R [E4918-1H4R] electrodes, except that the testing for mechanical properties and for classification is done on a groove weld that has a 60° included angle and, for electrodes up to 5/32 in [4.0 mm], welded in the vertical position with upward progression. The impact test results are evaluated using all five test values and higher values are required at –20°F [–30°C]. The maximum allowable moisture in-coating values in the "as-received" or reconditioned state are more restrictive than that required for E7018R [E4918R].   This classification closely corresponds to MIL-7018-M in the United States military standard MIL-E22200/10 specification, with the exception that the absorbed moisture limits on the electrode covering and the diffusible hydrogen limits on the weld metal are not as restrictive as those in MIL-E-22200/10.

 

A7.6.8.2 E7018M [E4918M] is intended to be used with dcep type current in order to produce the optimum mechanical properties. However, if the manufacturer desires, the electrode may also be classified as E7018 [E4918] provided all the requirements of E7018 [E4918] are met.

 

A7.6.8.3 In addition to their use on carbon steel, the E7018M [E4918M] electrodes are used for joining carbon steel to high-strength low-alloy steels and higher carbon steels. Fillet welds made in the horizontal and flat welding positions have a slightly convex weld face, with a smooth and finely rippled surface. The electrodes are characterized by a smooth, quiet arc, very low spatter, and medium arc penetration.

 

From the classification document (SFA-5.1 proper)

 

Table 3.

 

Table 10  for limit of moisture content %  - as received/conditioned and as exposed

 

Table 11

 

 

 

From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 4wheels
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 7:14 PM
To: Materials & Welding
Subject: [MW:26679] 7018

 

Hello,

What is the difference between 7018 and 7018m? 

Also, I see on ebay rods that are 7018m have a designation of level 1 - what is the level 1?

 

Thanks.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [MW:26685] Nickel Less Than 1%

Please refer below about your query. 
Well Explain by Mr. Goswami
 
Nickel in C-Mn steel increases the acicular ferrite. Usually ferrite in C-Mn steel, which is usually soft is polygonal ferrite. Increase of acicular ferrite causes increase of UTS, impact strength and at the same time hardness also. The last one(hardness control) is  the topmost priority in Sour Service.
 
Theoretical studies and practical work has established that 1% Ni in weld metal is the optimum to get the desired requirements of sour service. Acceptance  of Ni beyond 1% is still debatable and subject to many studies.
 
Please see the attachments for your reference and information.
 
Thanks.
 
 
Pradip Goswami, P.Eng,IWE
Welding & Metallurgical Specialist
Ontario, Canada

On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:34 PM, 'Shashank Vagal' via Materials & Welding <materials-welding@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Hello dear,
May be you will find it explained more extensively in this article:

 
Best Regards,
Shashank C Vagal  (Quality Adviser), (+91) 8082395502, 8779046302, 74000330711
Neo Metal-Analyst & NDT Services (Approved by IBR, Thermax, AERB)
Regd Office: 301, PRATHAMESH, M G Rd – Mahant Rd, Vile Parle East, Mumbai 400 057 INDIA
Tel: +91 22 2611 6640 / (+91) 9821386292 / 9819191861    
Works Office: A-25, Geet Siddhee, Sector No. 11, Pradhikaran, Gat No. 62, Boradewasti, Moshi, Dist: Haveli, PCMC, Pune – 411044, Maharashtra, India    
www.neometalanalystndt.com / enquiry@neometalanalystndt.com nach_sam@yahoo.com






On Saturday, 22 July 2017 10:44 AM, sn vl <weldinspn@gmail.com> wrote:


Dear Experts,

In NACE MR0175 Why Ni was restricted less than 1% in Carbon and Low alloy Steels.




Please Clarify .


Regards
SNVL.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Sunday, July 23, 2017

Re: [MW:26684] Magnetic particle testing of fillet joints - Yoke or Prod?

Dear Sir, 

Good Morning , i Have Agree with your commends , I like to know that when you doing vertical Weld Joint at Dry method , we can able to use same yoke method 

if we have any problem , let me know what kind of problem we will face on it 

Material : S235J2 (Zinc Coated )

Best Regards
Sankar.k
Welding Inspector 
Enka 

On Thursday, November 3, 2011 at 12:42:00 AM UTC+3, hpi001 wrote:

You only can use the prod method when putting the electrodes on the weld surface because of the magnetic field lines, in my opinion a Yoke will be the best method. Beside that when you don't have proper contact with the probes there is a risk of arcs which can cause copper penetration in the surface of your material.

 

Met vriendelijke groeten / Best Regards

 

Herman Pieper

 

Pieper Quality Support & Inspection

Phone: +31 (0)521 380083

Fax:     +31 (0)84 7539225

Cell:     +31 (0)6 51691215

www.pieper-qsi.nl

 

Van: material...@googlegroups.com [mailto:material...@googlegroups.com] Namens rajkumarantoni
Verzonden: woensdag 2 november 2011 14:43
Aan: material...@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: Re: [MW:12818] Magnetic particle testing of fillet joints - Yoke or Prod?

 

Dear Mr.Prabhakar,
Prod method will be best.BUt kindly check the size of weld.

On Nov 2, 2011 7:07 PM, "prabha...@gmail.com" <prabha...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

Could someone throw some light on the the following topics:

1. Which method (Yoke or Prod) should be used to inspect Fillet welds with Magnetic Particle Inspection.

Thanks & Regards,
G.Prabhakar

--
To post to this group, send email to material...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

--
To post to this group, send email to material...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Saturday, July 22, 2017

Re: [MW:26683] Nickel Less Than 1%

Hello dear,
May be you will find it explained more extensively in this article:

 
Best Regards,
Shashank C Vagal  (Quality Adviser), (+91) 8082395502, 8779046302, 74000330711
Neo Metal-Analyst & NDT Services (Approved by IBR, Thermax, AERB)
Regd Office: 301, PRATHAMESH, M G Rd – Mahant Rd, Vile Parle East, Mumbai 400 057 INDIA
Tel: +91 22 2611 6640 / (+91) 9821386292 / 9819191861    
Works Office: A-25, Geet Siddhee, Sector No. 11, Pradhikaran, Gat No. 62, Boradewasti, Moshi, Dist: Haveli, PCMC, Pune – 411044, Maharashtra, India    
www.neometalanalystndt.com / enquiry@neometalanalystndt.com / nach_sam@yahoo.com






On Saturday, 22 July 2017 10:44 AM, sn vl <weldinspn@gmail.com> wrote:


Dear Experts,

In NACE MR0175 Why Ni was restricted less than 1% in Carbon and Low alloy Steels.

Inline image 1


Please Clarify .


Regards
SNVL.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[MW:26679] identification and tractability

why identification and tractability is mandatory for LTCS and NACEpiping materials ?

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[MW:26679] Nickel Less Than 1%

Dear Experts,

In NACE MR0175 Why Ni was restricted less than 1% in Carbon and Low alloy Steels.




Please Clarify .


Regards
SNVL.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Friday, July 21, 2017

[MW:26679] 7018

Hello,
What is the difference between 7018 and 7018m? 
Also, I see on ebay rods that are 7018m have a designation of level 1 - what is the level 1?

Thanks.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[MW:34866] Presentation for WPS ,PQR AND WPQ as per ASME Sec IX in power point

Dear Experts.        If anyone having presentation of WPS,PQR and WPQ  as per ASME  SEC.IX  in power point then please share . Regards Sanja...